Edition: India
Trending Now
Breaking

Fact-Checking Policy

Every TraceNews story is checked before it goes live. This page explains how, so you can hold us to it.

Before Publication

  1. Claims are separated from opinion

    The editor lists every factual claim in a draft — numbers, dates, names, quotes, causes — and checks each one individually.

  2. Each claim is traced to a source

    We prefer primary sources: official filings, judgments, government data, company statements, and our own interviews. Where only a secondary source exists, we say so in the article.

  3. Numbers are recalculated

    Percentages, growth figures, currency conversions and rankings are recomputed from the original data rather than copied from a press release.

  4. Images and video are verified

    We check the origin and date of visual material before using it, and we do not present old footage as current.

  5. The subject gets a right of reply

    Anyone facing an allegation is contacted before publication and their response is included.

Rating Claims We Fact-Check

In our dedicated fact-check articles, we label each claim clearly:

True

The claim is accurate and supported by verifiable evidence.

Mostly True

Accurate in substance, but missing context or slightly overstated.

Misleading

Technically accurate but framed so as to create a false impression.

False

The claim is contradicted by the available evidence.

Unverified

No reliable evidence exists either way. We say so rather than guessing.

What We Publish With Our Fact-Checks

Every fact-check names the claim, who made it, where and when, the evidence we examined, and links to the sources so readers can check our work themselves.

Submit a Claim for Checking

Send claims, forwarded messages or viral posts to tracenews121317@gmail.com. We prioritise claims that are spreading widely and could affect people’s health, money or voting decisions.

Our Own Mistakes

If a fact-check itself turns out to be wrong, we correct it under our Corrections Policy and say plainly what we got wrong.